₦1,000
In Stock
 Facts:
 The claimant who is a customer of the defendant filed a suit against it at the High
 Court of Lagos State claiming inter alia, the sum of N5,000,000.00 (Five Million
 Naira) for special and general damages accruing from an alleged negligence
 and breach of contract. The claimant alleged that in November, 2014 she instructed
 the defendant to effect the transfer of £2,479.68 (Two Thousand Four Hundred
 and Seventy Nine Pounds Sixty Eight Pence)to Reading University for the balance
 of her daughter’s accommodation fees and in compliance with the instruction,
 the sum of N666,014.79 (Six Hundred and Sixty Six Thousand Fourteen Naira,
 Seventy Nine Kobo) the Naira value was debited from her Account with the
 Defendant Bank. Other attendant charges such as  invisible Trade Charges, Value
 Added Tax, Swift Charges and Offshore Charges totaling the sum ofN683,534.79
 (Six Hundred and Eighty Three Thousand Five Hundred and Thirty Four Naira
 Seventy Nine Kobo). The claimant further alleged that in spite of the debit, the
 money was not remitted to the university which eventually led to the claimant’s
 daughter being ejected from her accommodation. The claimant’s daughter was
 alleged to have been inconvenienced and embarrassed by the situation and that
 the claimant’s husband had to make alternative arrangements to secure
 accommodation for the daughter at an increased cost. Even after notifying the
 bank, it failed to resolve the issue until February, 2015 when it refunded to the
 claimant the sum ofN666,014.79 (Six Hundred and Sixty Six Thousand Fourteen
 Naira Seventy Nine Kobo) being the accommodation fee without refunding the
 other charges deducted.
 The defendant in their statement of defence insisted that the claimant’s instructions
 were carried out and that their UK correspondent bank informed them that the
 money had been transferred but that it was discovered that the beneficiary bank
 withheld the money due to preliminary investigations, a procedure which it had
 no control over. They were obliged to return the money when it could not be
 released by the beneficiary bank and as such could not be liable to the claimant.